Byron Bay: Australia’s Cool Table
February 1, 2007

Byron Bay is a hip little town. My mother chose it over giong to the the Gold Coast because, in her skimming of the Lonely Planet guide, it struck her as a quieter, less-crowded place. Wrong again, Mum (the previous instance of Wrong being when she turned into oncoming traffic).
It’s like spring break here. Backpacker’s hostels abound; trendy shops line the street (that’s singular, “street” — it’s popular, but small); and things here actually stay open up to — and sometimes beyond — 10 pm. We spend our first evening walking the beach in the dark, though pretty far from the main beach area because that’s where all the young people have congregated, with their loud music and their drinking.
The next day, armed with towels and swimsuits, we head down to take our first actual swim in the ocean (actually, it’s just the bay, but it’s salty enough to pass). We swim in shifts, naturally fearing for our possessions in this thick crowd of young people. It’s a good time, battling those dastardly waves, and I know my mother enjoys it too, though I don’t really see her enjoying it, distracted as I was by the line of topless sunbathers situated between myself and the water. I didn’t even choose this place to set down, my mum did.
That’s all you need to know about Byron Bay. Topless sunbathers.






February 1, 2007 at 2:50 pm
Aww, and here I thought those underlinded passages were links.
February 1, 2007 at 5:30 pm
I wanted to pull out my camera, I really did. But there’s just no inconspicuous way to go about that on a beach. I had to just settle for slack-jawed staring. So no, those underlines are just for extra emphasis. And really, is there anything in this world that deserves extra emphasis more than topless sunbathers?
February 1, 2007 at 11:35 pm
Topless, juggling sunbathers.
February 2, 2007 at 12:52 am
Topless, juggling sunbathers.
February 2, 2007 at 5:33 am
Were any of them bottomless?
February 2, 2007 at 10:19 am
Believe me when I say I looked and looked hard, but no, there were no bottomless people on the beach, male or female.
You know, it occurs to me now that if one is juggling, then one isn’t really sunbathing. Withdraw your comment, James!
February 3, 2007 at 1:38 am
Well, thanks for your due dilligence anyway.
February 5, 2007 at 1:44 pm
You’re still being bathed in the sun while you’re juggling.
I withdraw nothing.
February 5, 2007 at 3:47 pm
Yeah, but passively. By your standards, anyone who’s just out walking in the sun is a sunbather. I say you need to be actively laying out in the sun for the express purpose of bathing in sun for it to be considered sunbathing. Withdraw, I say!
February 5, 2007 at 3:50 pm
Incidentally, everyone read comment #2 again, but with “camera” as euphemism.
February 6, 2007 at 12:45 am
Funny how Beal has always called it ‘camera’.
Even back in high school. Remember those days when he’d spend hours messing around in the communications room with his ‘camera’, learning new tricks, turning it off and on, perfecting his tilts and pans?
February 6, 2007 at 2:24 am
Suck my camera, graeme.
February 7, 2007 at 9:37 am
Being bathed in the sun is the only criteria.
I withdraw nothing.
February 11, 2007 at 3:16 am
Question is: can you sit in the tub and bathe while juggling? Is that juggling and bathing? Some people can even juggle with one hand, therefore leaving the other hand to acutally bathe (wash behind the ears, etc.). So, if we change the bathing to sun bathing (sitting in the sun instead of water), does the parallel hold? If one was reclining on a beach, juggling one handed, while well lathered in tanning oil, one could be said to be both juggling and sun bathing…no?